|
Topical
Issues and Controversies
Natural Gas Pipeline
The State of Alaska
favors the Alaska Highway route for a proposed natural gas pipeline to
deliver gas to Alberta and the Lower 48 states. The Alaska Highway route
would create jobs in Alaska, provide natural gas to Alaska communities
and follow an existing right-of-way without the environmental risks of
a Beaufort Sea route. The Alaska Highway pipeline would go from Prudhoe
to Fairbanks and then follow the highway east to the Yukon Territory,
British Columbia and Alberta. The Northwest Territories prefers an Alaska-Canada
Beaufort Sea pipeline to its MacKenzie Delta gas fields and than have
a single pipeline system deliver Alaska and Canadian gas to Alberta. A
third proposal calls for an all-Alaska route from the North Slope to Valdez
or to a Cook Inlet port on the Kenai Peninsula. There have also been suggestions
that there is enough gas to support more than one pipeline. The Canadian
government is officially neutral on the routes.
Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge
The State of Alaska
supports environmentally sound development of ANWR oil reserves, which
geologists believe lie beneath the coastal plain of the refuge. The Canadian
government opposes ANWR development on environmental grounds. It would
take an act of Congress to permit drilling in the refuge. Among those
opposed to oil activities in the refuge are the Gwichin Indians, who live
on both sides of the border in northeast Alaska and northwest Canadian
arctic communities on the edge of the refuge. The Gwichin lead a subsistence
way of life and depend on the Porcupine caribou herd, which migrates across
the Alaska-Yukon border.
Tulsequah Chief
Mine, B.C.
The State of Alaska
opposes development of the Tulsequah Chief mine in British Columbia east
of Juneau as a potential environmental threat to Alaska fisheries. The
state and Alaska fishing interests fear that the mine could pollute the
Taku River watershed and harm the fishing grounds. The Alaska Dept. of
Fish & Game has led the opposition to this near-border project and
registered its concerns with U.S. and Canadian officials. Canadian mining
interests have maintained that the mine can be put into operation without
causing harm to the environment or the fishery. The dispute remains unresolved,
but the new British Columbia provincial government has proposed creating
a forum of top officials for dealing with this and similar issues.
Fisheries
-
U.S.-Canada negotiations
have led to a recent agreement resolving long and bitter disputes
over Pacific salmon fisheries. The dispute put U.S. and Canadian fishermen
at odds over how to go about their business. Concerns remain over
the future health of fish stocks, catch allocations, escapement, and
related issues, but the agreement appears to have returned the debate
to fisheries management agencies.
-
Alaska Lt.
Governor Loren Leman is the Member Designate of the North Pacific
Anadromous Fish Commission, which helps fashion North Pacific fisheries
policy for
the United States, Canada, Japan and Russia.
-
Aquaculture is
prohibited in Alaska, which is concerned about potential problems
from British Columbia and Pacific Northwest fish farming operations,
which could affect the health and integrity of wild stocks. There
is also market competition.
Border
Long-standing but
relatively quiet U.S.-Canadian maritime border dispute at the Alaska-British
Columbia boundary at the Dixon Entrance, south of Alaska’s Prince of Wales
Island and north of Canada’s Queen Charlotte Islands.
| Back
to Canada Home Page |
|